|  | 


Printing the Internet: Preserving our Digital History

We oftentimes hear of historians archiving old documents onto a digital server, bloggers recording their thoughts on white screens, and news articles being published via social media. We use digital ‘encyclopedias’ like Wikipedia rather than opening actual books. Credible newspaper after newspaper have ditched the old fashioned art of publishing to save costs and increase viewers. In a sense, we’ve uploaded our entire world to a digital cloud – one that could crash in a heartbeat.

We’ve become numb to the concept of what the internet should actually mean for us. In this dark age of information, one dominated by a push for censorship and a misuse of infinite information, we’ve ignored the world around us change. I’ve talked about merging technology in the classroom, the evolution of traditional retail thanks to online stores, and the concept of censorship online. We’ve seen books be tossed in favor of e-book machines, customer service be replaced by autonomic machines, and television slowly fade to the hands of streaming programs (like Hulu, which follows me on Twitter for some reason) online. But now, I think it’s important to keep the Internet’s “history” for generations to come.

Some official institutions are already attempting some rather primitive methods in order to preserve the Internet’s position in the past. The White House has frozen the Obama administration’s website in time, locking it from editing and keeping it up only as a historical confirmation of the events that the administration went through. As the website alerts readers at the top of every page, “This is historical material “frozen in time”. The website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work.” This is an excellent idea, but it won’t mean much if the Internet were to suddenly vanish.

There are two major reasons to why the Internet should be preserved for generations to come. For one, webpages are not immortal. As we’ve witnessed, website editors can easily change content or choose to delete websites all together. Yes, there are web archives that screenshot websites of importance on a regular basis, but they can’t record every second of the internet through spiders and screenshots. The main reason why the Internet should be preserved is that the Internet might just not last forever. It may seem like some wacky conspiracy theory, but if the internet managed to crash and be unable to come back – think of everything that would crash with it.

By the end of 2016, global Internet traffic reached 1.1 zettabytes per year, according to Cisco. With these calculations global Internet data is expected to increase to 2 zettabytes per year. What’s a zettabyte? Well, a zettabyte is 200 terabytes. What’s a terabyte? One million million bytes – or, for you nerds, 240 bytes. That’s a lot of information that happens to be floating around online – per year.

In 2012, David Eagleman, an American writer and neuroscientist, reported that a backup security plan for the vast amount of human knowledge residing online is necessary. In 2014, German company PediaPress announced their campaign to raise money to print all 4.5 million articles (as of early 2014) on Wikipedia. They estimated the project would take up 80 meters of shelf space, being composed of “one thousand volumes, 1,200 pages each — more than one million pages in all”.

We’ve done so well with uploading our lives and histories online that it’s just about time we start being concerned with preserving the internet as a whole; so that future generations will have “access” to all the information left on the internet, even if the internet ceases to exist.

Internet data.




I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books. Unlike the stereotypical leftist, I do not necessarily censor myself. I apologize in advance if you find yourself offended by something I’ve said; but I do enjoy hearing criticism and having debates.

Related Articles

  • The Relationship Between the Military and Video Games

    The Relationship Between the Military and Video Games

    Video games have come a long from being a niche hobby. Everyone’s a gamer from your older relative who’s platform of choice is Facebook, to perhaps sons, daughters and younger siblings that play Minecraft on the family computer. They have become a mainstream part of society as can be seen by the Pokemon Go phenomenon.

  • Merging Technology with Kagan

    Merging Technology with Kagan

    If you’re in the public education system, then you’ve heard about (or have been forced to use) Kagan activities like Bloom’s Taxonomy Questions and the Fan-n-Pick Strategy – two methods to incite engagement through knowledge-based questions that we’ll be talking about today. I personally have a bias against Kaganist (clever pun, please love it) activities, but

  • Overhyped and Overpromised: The Problems with Marketing in the Gaming Industry

    Overhyped and Overpromised: The Problems with Marketing in the Gaming Industry

    From branded institutions to independent developers, the concept of serial lying in the form of overpromising and overhyping has been a huge part of the advertising and marketing strategies behind some of the biggest flops in the past few years. From Peter Molyneux’s repeated “pathological lying” and Ubisoft’s horrendous handling of “Watch Dogs” to the laughable failure resulting in Hello Games’ “No Man Sky”, the methods and guidelines of marketing within the industry need to be recreated. Or maybe developers need to learn to shut the hell up.

  • Pokemon GO: Nintendo’s Gimmicks

    Pokemon GO: Nintendo’s Gimmicks

    For a company that is relatively famed in the handheld gaming industry, Nintendo has been so utterly turned off by mobile game platforms for the longest time. Pokemon GO is the first actual step Nintendo, the company of “innovation ahead of its time” has ever made. Yet this first step has been a very successful one, with Nintendo making $35 million within its first two weeks of launch.

  • Betamax vs VHS: The Videotape Format War

    Betamax vs VHS: The Videotape Format War

    Lasting from the late 1970s and pursuing into the 1980s, the videotape format war influenced the modern world through intense capitalistic competition between the models of consumer-level analog videocassettes and cassette recorders. The two sides? The Betamax and the Video Home System, commonly referred to as the VHS. It’s kind of amazing to think of this in a “historical” sense. But, it’s also how modern technology works. The VHS won this war, becoming the dominant home video format for a period of time, but ultimately it would become obsolete on its own terms.

1 Comment

  1. Yuli loves bread



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *


Joseph Kaminski
I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive up-to-date notifications.

Join 348 other subscribers


Dear reader,

In September 2016, my website server crashed. I've been working on fixing everything since.

This site is currently in a beta state, meaning that design changes and the addition of new features will be frequent.