|  | 

Politics

The Case for Scottish Independence

The United Kingdom is on the brinks of falling apart thanks to the rising tension between the kingdoms within it. With the collection of countries controlled by a conservative government regardless of ideological separations, its more than obvious that residents within the U.K. don’t see eye to eye on most issues. The United Kingdom just might not be so united after all, with English and Scottish differences heating up even further because of Brexit.

To understand the modern, you have to understand the history. So, a really, really, really brief explanation concerning the history of this so-called United Kindom:

As James IV of Scotland married Margaret Tudor, the sister of Henry VIII, the communications between the two countries began to intertwine. The Reformation occurred, and Scottish Protestants turned towards a Church of England, joining the opposition against the Catholic French.

James VI of Scotland and James I of England came together to create a “United Kingdom” of sorts between the Great Brits and the Scots, and the English had begun to operate as if the two nations were one country – especially in terms of religion.

Insert the entire history of a cycle of civil wars, and Scotland crowned Charles II within the gates of Edinburgh in 1651. Meanwhile, Cromwell continued north to impose his rule in London. England and Scotland were, unofficially and uneasily, united until restorations within the doctrines of 1660.

Twenty years goes by. In 1688 James VII was overthrown in England, and the Scots became outraged in their lack of involvement in the governing situation. They announced their interest in crowning James’s son rather than the English’s Protestant Elector of Hanover.

The Scots soon faced an economic situation: their colony at Darien in Panama had collapsed in its entirely. The late 17th century was a difficult period for Scotland, and it soon became notified through the increasingly rising financial crisis within the northern-most Isle territories. Bankruptcy was threatened, and the Scots found themselves desperately relying upon England’s vastly growing wealth. Meanwhile, England had decided that they wanted to implement a Stuart restoration.

What helped both causes? The 1707 Act of Union, of course.

The union of the two nations would enable Scotland to recover, forcing the Scottish Parliament into compliance with the Act of Settlement.

In Scotland, some claimed that union would enable Scotland to recover from the financial disaster wrought by the Darien scheme through English assistance and the lifting of measures put in place through the Alien Act to force the Scottish Parliament into compliance with the Act of Settlement.

Not to get too historical, but this short description is rather important for the history of the so-called “United” Kingdom. Scotland was pressured into joining this union through economic deprivation and financial failure. I honestly believe that within the next few years, perhaps even shorter, Scotland will exit the United Kingdom based on the same principles of economic hardship, but mixed with ideological differences that are too far gone to repair.

Scotland is a rather liberal community being governed by the Party of Cameron (and perhaps soon the UKIP xenophobic movement) that has created tensions between the Isle residents. The Scottish Independence Referendum in 2014 highlighted this – that Scotland hasn’t been so approving of the English provisions for quite some time now. One major thing kept Scotland within the United Kingdom: The European Union.

Not to get offensive here, but Scotland understood that leaving the U.K. — a stable entity within the European Union – would be financial suicide. To ditch the pound sterling and unable to grab hold of the euro would be horrendous for the Scottish economy; sarcastically speaking, the old Scottish currency of haggis wouldn’t really fit the bill.

brexit votes

Brexit votes. Yellow districts voted for STAY. Blue districts voted for REMAIN.

Unfortunately, the men and women of the Lower Isles don’t seem to understand that Scotland remained within the U.K. to remain within the E.U., as confusing as that sounds. But now, with the U.K. voting by a slim majority (none of that slim majority residing within Scotland, mind you) to exit the E.U., Scotland has no reason to sit through the political torment that led them to referendum in 2014.

With the SNP calling for a new Scottish independence referendum, and Brexit proving to be a catastrophic economic decision, I publicly endorse the concept of Scotland leaving the U.K. to either create an “Independence Day” movement for itself or to rejoin the European Union as a sovereign entity.

Of course, this is just an opinionated piece. But an overwhelmingly “liberal population” being held hostage by an overall conservative entity for religious and economic reasons from the 17th-to-18th centuries does not equal a unified kingdom. Especially with such vast differences and a horrendously cut deal for the people to the north.

The English were all for “independence” from the European Union; but now that Scotland and Northern Ireland are re-opening the “independence” movements of their own, England wants to remain quiet.

If England wants to play a dangerous game with the E.U., Scotland has every right to abandon the United Kingdom ship before it sinks on its own.

case-scottish-independence

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books. Unlike the stereotypical leftist, I do not necessarily censor myself. I apologize in advance if you find yourself offended by something I’ve said; but I do enjoy hearing criticism and having debates.

Related Articles

  • Trump’s Turnkey Tyranny and Obama’s Drones

    Trump’s Turnkey Tyranny and Obama’s Drones

    We must not propagate Barack Obama’s eight year tenure as President until we understand the consequences behind everything in his term. Democrats – do not shout about how 44 was the “greatest president in recent memory” just yet. Republicans – do not refer to how 44 was the “worst president in American history” just yet…or

  • Meh! Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders Debate on Obamacare

    Meh! Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders Debate on Obamacare

    If you would have told me this time last year that Texas Senator Ted Cruz and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders were going to debate over the topic of Obamacare, I would have leaped for joy. I was a very strong supporter for Bernie Sanders and a very strong mocker of Ted Cruz during the 2016

  • The Department of Justice and Justifying the Unjustifiable

    The Department of Justice and Justifying the Unjustifiable

    It appears to be that Donald Trump’s administration can’t grasp the reality of what the Department of Justice is supposed to do. Like any authoritarian leader rooted in widespread fear and closely cornered narcissism, Donald Trump has failed to differentiate what it means to pledge allegiance to the constitution and to pledge allegiance to himself. Well, like any fine

  • The Discharge of Blue Dogism and The New Gilded Age

    The Discharge of Blue Dogism and The New Gilded Age

    As I’ve been discussing for the past few months, Americans are currently witnessing the end of an era for political elitism. The 2016 election cycle will go down in history as unprecedented; as concerning as the rise of Hitler during downdraught Germany and as destructive as the fall of Constantinople in 1453 was to the Roman

  • Nazi Punching and Dirty, Old Fascism

    Nazi Punching and Dirty, Old Fascism

    It appears to be that 2017 will be the start of severe political discourse. As I’ve discussed previously on this website, the self-proclaimed “Alt-Right” is a rising force in American politics that has finally made its way into White House briefings. It is important for all Americans to realize the true nature of “Alt-Right” behavior

POST YOUR COMMENTS

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Joseph Kaminski
I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books.

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive up-to-date notifications.

Join 348 other subscribers

AN IMPORTANT NOTICE

Dear reader,

In September 2016, my website server crashed. I've been working on fixing everything since.

This site is currently in a beta state, meaning that design changes and the addition of new features will be frequent.