|  |  | 

Psychology Technology

The Likert Scale

I know this is a little late in terms of technology and updates, but if you’re on Facebook you’ve noticed that the traditional “like” system has replaced itself with an optional range of emoticons. From “like” to “love” to “haha”, “wow”, “sad”, and “angry”; this new system allows interaction between social media aficionados to be more complex than ever before. It’s more than obvious why Facebook turned to this new system: a major flaw that’s plagued simple conversation since the beginning of instant messaging. Users have been forced to “like” messages coming from grieving widows and cancer patients. A bit of an, erm, awkward experience from both sides if you really think about it.

In case you don’t have a Facebook account, here’s a picture of the “Likert Scale” Facebook has set up:

facebook-reactions
With this addition to Facebook’s software, there’s a way to properly respond to any type of post. Someone’s dog died? Instead of “liking” it like before, try leaving a “sad” face. It’s a bit of an upgrade comparative to the like-dislike idea users have had for years, giving more than just one or two separate emotions as a way to express yourself.

Of course, this post is a little late. It’s been at least a couple months since the social media site set up this ‘likert’ system. I’ve seen some people really upset about the “goofy” emoticons and some people thankful for something more than the orthodox “like”. But, it’s not just “goofy emoticons” or “more options”, like people tend to think of it. From a psychological sense, Facebook is using something called — if you haven’t clued in by now — the LIKERT SCALE.

A Likert scale is a scale involved in questionnaires with the idea of conducting meaningful research. We’ve all seen and involved ourselves with the scale before, even without realizing it. Not just because it’s the most widely used approach in terms of surveys and interviews, but also because it can be implicated in just about, well, anything. A psychometric scale that allows people of all reading abilities to respond to questions of interest through five or more individual ‘ratings’, a Likert scale can immediately assess people’s attitudes through a majority of subjects at hand.

The scale is named after its rather famous inventor, an American social psychologist by the name of Rensis Likert. If you’re interested in social psychology, you should check out some of his most important works: Human Organization; Management and Value is a fantastic read and New Ways of Managing Conflict is even better. Regardless, his work on his Likert scale created a template for success in sociological surveys and business management. Nowadays, it’s used in everything from government forms to online flash questionnaires; the systematic approach of the Likert scale has revolutionized research in such simple ways. That’s the mindset Facebook had for the year it took their staff to create the perfect set of emoticons to use for expressing opinions.

Now of course, Facebook’s set up isn’t an exact replica of the famous Likert scale, seeing that it’s attached to an infinite amount of posts rather than a set amount of questions in a survey. But, with Facebook’s style and setup, it’s easy to see the implications the universal scale had on them.

It’s interesting to see how it took a website dedicated to expressing opinions and emotions to change from a singular method of “liking” to an actual “Likert” scale.

the-likert-scale

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books. Unlike the stereotypical leftist, I do not necessarily censor myself. I apologize in advance if you find yourself offended by something I’ve said; but I do enjoy hearing criticism and having debates.

Related Articles

  • Printing the Internet: Preserving our Digital History

    Printing the Internet: Preserving our Digital History

    We oftentimes hear of historians archiving old documents onto a digital server, bloggers recording their thoughts on white screens, and news articles being published via social media. We use digital ‘encyclopedias’ like Wikipedia rather than opening actual books. Credible newspaper after newspaper have ditched the old fashioned art of publishing to save costs and increase viewers. In

  • Merging Technology with Kagan

    Merging Technology with Kagan

    If you’re in the public education system, then you’ve heard about (or have been forced to use) Kagan activities like Bloom’s Taxonomy Questions and the Fan-n-Pick Strategy – two methods to incite engagement through knowledge-based questions that we’ll be talking about today. I personally have a bias against Kaganist (clever pun, please love it) activities, but

  • Overhyped and Overpromised: The Problems with Marketing in the Gaming Industry

    Overhyped and Overpromised: The Problems with Marketing in the Gaming Industry

    From branded institutions to independent developers, the concept of serial lying in the form of overpromising and overhyping has been a huge part of the advertising and marketing strategies behind some of the biggest flops in the past few years. From Peter Molyneux’s repeated “pathological lying” and Ubisoft’s horrendous handling of “Watch Dogs” to the laughable failure resulting in Hello Games’ “No Man Sky”, the methods and guidelines of marketing within the industry need to be recreated. Or maybe developers need to learn to shut the hell up.

  • Is Being Single Better Than Marriage?

    Is Being Single Better Than Marriage?

    For centuries, marriage has been considered a necessary factor in society. One that creates a family unit to work in society while “training” the next generation – the married couples’ kids. We’ve seen multiple changes in social roles – especially in the so-called typical family unit – in the last few decades; thus, we’re seeing the social value of family change before our very eyes. Is being single psychologically better than being married?

  • Why Do We Procrastinate?

    Why Do We Procrastinate?

    If you think about it from an evolutionary standpoint, procrastination seems like a pretty terrible trait. Consider the nomadic tribes of primitive humans: Those early men and women who had to survive without WiFi and grocery stores. Imagine what would have happened to those early tribes if several well-endowed, good hunters decided “eh, we’ll chase the food down tomorrow morning.” They wouldn’t have survived. Humanity might have been delayed, even.

1 Comment

POST YOUR COMMENTS

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Joseph Kaminski
I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books.

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive up-to-date notifications.

Join 348 other subscribers

AN IMPORTANT NOTICE

Dear reader,

In September 2016, my website server crashed. I've been working on fixing everything since.

This site is currently in a beta state, meaning that design changes and the addition of new features will be frequent.