|  | 


The Battle for Privacy

Recently, the FBI has asked Apple to break into an iPhone that belongs to one of the San Bernardino shooters. To create a “backdoor” to the encryption policies that Apple has previously set up to protect the privacy of their users.

iPhone users like myself have the option to set a security feature within their settings that have managed to stump federal agents — the ability to set your cellular phone to wipe all data stored on it if the pass-code is entered wrong a certain number of times. It’s a great system, really. A security measure to make sure important data — from credit card information and emails to selfies and text messages — stay out of the wrong hands.

It’s starting to look like George Orwell’s 1984 or Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, if you really pay attention to the world of tech. This battle for privacy has been going on longer than we’ve been paying attention to it. Eventually, if the federal government has their way, what privacy could be left when it comes to the technology that withstands yet borders the boundaries of constitutional rights? Televisions oftentimes come with web-cameras, cellular phones have GPS tracking on them, the world of tech could be used in menacing and malicious ways if there are no restrictions on the sacristy of privacy.

Apple Privacy

I stand with Apple and Google, the monopoly-dominating tech giants that I’d usually be against in terms of corporate greed. The federal government has no right asking for a backdoor to encryption that has kept iPhone users safe from hackers and thieves — something the government seems to be full of right now when it comes to Internet policies. Google, if you haven’t been keeping up with this, recently supported Apple on this case, but I highly doubt they’ll go anywhere close to where Apple is heading when it comes to court liabilities.

The government already has loopholes when it comes to these sorts of situations. So, why go straight to Apple and demand an encrypted backdoor that could lead to disaster?

Want the shooters phone messages? Go to the carrier! Sprint, Verizon, AT&T…it doesn’t matter! We already know they store phone messages for up to seven years! 

Want the emails? I bet this guy used Gmail or Outlook, the two most-common email providers in use. Guess who they’re owned by? Corporate shills Google and Microsoft — both of which have mandated restrictions when it comes to security and storage. I guarantee they’d hand them over to the federal government.

Want the search history? Google, bing, yahoo…it still doesn’t matter. Head on towards the corporate headquarters, knock on a couple doors, and you’ll have a case-study full of the domestic terror suspect’s search history.

In the amount of time we’ve spent debating about whether or not Apple should go through with what the government wants them to do, the government could have already gone to the middlemen (those of the carriers, the email hosts, and the search engines) and gotten all the information they need for this case. I highly believe the government is trying to bypass middlemen to make things easier and quicker and more authoritarian in the future.

Why go to the locksmith to make keys for individual homes when you have the universal skeleton key for every backdoor in America? Privacy matters, and I’m on Apple’s side (along with basically everyone else) when it comes to the battle for it.



I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books. Unlike the stereotypical leftist, I do not necessarily censor myself. I apologize in advance if you find yourself offended by something I’ve said; but I do enjoy hearing criticism and having debates.

Related Articles

  • The Relationship Between the Military and Video Games

    The Relationship Between the Military and Video Games

    Video games have come a long from being a niche hobby. Everyone’s a gamer from your older relative who’s platform of choice is Facebook, to perhaps sons, daughters and younger siblings that play Minecraft on the family computer. They have become a mainstream part of society as can be seen by the Pokemon Go phenomenon.

  • Printing the Internet: Preserving our Digital History

    Printing the Internet: Preserving our Digital History

    We oftentimes hear of historians archiving old documents onto a digital server, bloggers recording their thoughts on white screens, and news articles being published via social media. We use digital ‘encyclopedias’ like Wikipedia rather than opening actual books. Credible newspaper after newspaper have ditched the old fashioned art of publishing to save costs and increase viewers. In

  • Merging Technology with Kagan

    Merging Technology with Kagan

    If you’re in the public education system, then you’ve heard about (or have been forced to use) Kagan activities like Bloom’s Taxonomy Questions and the Fan-n-Pick Strategy – two methods to incite engagement through knowledge-based questions that we’ll be talking about today. I personally have a bias against Kaganist (clever pun, please love it) activities, but

  • Overhyped and Overpromised: The Problems with Marketing in the Gaming Industry

    Overhyped and Overpromised: The Problems with Marketing in the Gaming Industry

    From branded institutions to independent developers, the concept of serial lying in the form of overpromising and overhyping has been a huge part of the advertising and marketing strategies behind some of the biggest flops in the past few years. From Peter Molyneux’s repeated “pathological lying” and Ubisoft’s horrendous handling of “Watch Dogs” to the laughable failure resulting in Hello Games’ “No Man Sky”, the methods and guidelines of marketing within the industry need to be recreated. Or maybe developers need to learn to shut the hell up.

  • Pokemon GO: Nintendo’s Gimmicks

    Pokemon GO: Nintendo’s Gimmicks

    For a company that is relatively famed in the handheld gaming industry, Nintendo has been so utterly turned off by mobile game platforms for the longest time. Pokemon GO is the first actual step Nintendo, the company of “innovation ahead of its time” has ever made. Yet this first step has been a very successful one, with Nintendo making $35 million within its first two weeks of launch.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *


Joseph Kaminski
I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive up-to-date notifications.

Join 348 other subscribers


Dear reader,

In September 2016, my website server crashed. I've been working on fixing everything since.

This site is currently in a beta state, meaning that design changes and the addition of new features will be frequent.