|  | 


Does the World Need a World Policeman?

The date is May 8th, 1945. The occasion would be VE Day, or Victory in Europe Day. To some people, this is the end of World War II, others may attempt to argue that it didn’t end until the peace treaty signed with Japan occurred in 1951.

However, the powerhouse of Nazi Germany has fallen — and the world begins to rebuild socially and culturally. For centuries, Great Britain had been looked up to as the world policeman. In 1815, during the Congress of Vienna, which had the primary goal of redrawing the political borders of Europe to punish France, four countries were looked up upon: Russia, Prussia, Austria and Great Britain. The world is this ever expanding group of cultures and significant authorities controlled by larger political countries. Whether it be 1815 under Russia, Prussia, Austria and Britain, or 1943 with Britain and Germany, the world has looked up to this World Policeman. In today’s modern world, America happens to be in this position. Several events in Modern History have been because of the fact that we are seen as the world’s policeman. The Cold War, for example, was a massive verbal race between America and Russia to see who was better.

If you attempt to argue that America lost this “war”, you would have little to no evidence. While it is true the Soviets in Russia during this time were the first to send a man into space, America was the first to step on the moon, planting the flag and showing superiority to Russia. Eventually, the Cold War fizzled down and America still held tightly onto its position in the world. Twelve presidents later, and America still grips tightly onto the fact that they are the world policeman. But should they? Understand the fact that America, in recent times, cannot even keep their own government open.

We’ve thought about this position for over a century now, ever since our victories in the Spanish-American War and World War I, but the American ego was boosted even further after the end of World War II.

Senators argue about everything from foreign war to domestic policies, and the ongoing war on the home-front between Liberals and Conservatives is a major waste of time due to national policies so corrupted that nothing could fix them. The fact of the matter is that certain other world powers, such as China and Russia, are watching. Waiting for the chance to strike America in its economic wound, and become the world policeman.

America should no longer cling to its role as the top dog if they cannot handle keeping open their own government. The government has shut down several times in just the past few years over very childish issues, such as not agreeing on a health care law, disagreeing on big vs little government, and extending the debt limit before certain dates. However, that does not necessarily mean any country should have a world policeman. Does the world really need an overly corrupted government to control its world policies?

When Syria decided to go against the UNITED NATIONS, many other countries backed down and let America do the world a favor. The world shouldn’t have to rely on one, two, three, or in the Congress of Vienna’s case four nations to decide what is to become of the domestic and foreign policies. While it does have have pros for having a world cop, such as an easier way to avoid world wars and issues against regulations, and it is easy to see that a world filled with isolationist countries would lead us nowhere. However, without a world cop, there would be less rivalry between the more developed and industrial countries.

The world does have issues when it comes to choosing how the world will progress forward. However, relying on stronger countries will lead nowhere, as that country could do the wrong thing. Rivalries between the more industrialized countries will eventually lead to debt ceilings and world wars, as history has shown. However, despite all of this, if we don’t have a world cop, smaller countries would develop nuclear and chemical weapons and have no rules for them. A chemist, a very long time ago, tried to get the world to give nuclear weapons to smaller countries to allow them to feel the power countries like America and Russia felt on a daily basis. He, of course, was laughed out of the building.

This was written on October 21st, 2013. I recently found it on one of my flash drives. I thought it deserved to be posted.



I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books. Unlike the stereotypical leftist, I do not necessarily censor myself. I apologize in advance if you find yourself offended by something I’ve said; but I do enjoy hearing criticism and having debates.

Related Articles

  • The Relationship Between the Military and Video Games

    The Relationship Between the Military and Video Games

    Video games have come a long from being a niche hobby. Everyone’s a gamer from your older relative who’s platform of choice is Facebook, to perhaps sons, daughters and younger siblings that play Minecraft on the family computer. They have become a mainstream part of society as can be seen by the Pokemon Go phenomenon.

  • Overhyped and Overpromised: The Problems with Marketing in the Gaming Industry

    Overhyped and Overpromised: The Problems with Marketing in the Gaming Industry

    From branded institutions to independent developers, the concept of serial lying in the form of overpromising and overhyping has been a huge part of the advertising and marketing strategies behind some of the biggest flops in the past few years. From Peter Molyneux’s repeated “pathological lying” and Ubisoft’s horrendous handling of “Watch Dogs” to the laughable failure resulting in Hello Games’ “No Man Sky”, the methods and guidelines of marketing within the industry need to be recreated. Or maybe developers need to learn to shut the hell up.

  • Is Being Single Better Than Marriage?

    Is Being Single Better Than Marriage?

    For centuries, marriage has been considered a necessary factor in society. One that creates a family unit to work in society while “training” the next generation – the married couples’ kids. We’ve seen multiple changes in social roles – especially in the so-called typical family unit – in the last few decades; thus, we’re seeing the social value of family change before our very eyes. Is being single psychologically better than being married?

  • Why Do We Procrastinate?

    Why Do We Procrastinate?

    If you think about it from an evolutionary standpoint, procrastination seems like a pretty terrible trait. Consider the nomadic tribes of primitive humans: Those early men and women who had to survive without WiFi and grocery stores. Imagine what would have happened to those early tribes if several well-endowed, good hunters decided “eh, we’ll chase the food down tomorrow morning.” They wouldn’t have survived. Humanity might have been delayed, even.

  • The Religious Pyramid

    The Religious Pyramid

    Introducing the hierarchy of religious beliefs, as basically defined by Crispian Jago. It’s fairly easy to read, with the most harmless at the bottom and the most harmful at the top. The hierarchy argues that an individual or institution cannot make their way up the pyramid without hitting all the levels below. It can be described, simply, as a ladder. Everyone, as individuals, or every collection of institutions, as a society, starts at the very bottom and will accordingly adjust towards the environment surrounding them and the emotions within them.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *


Joseph Kaminski
I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive up-to-date notifications.

Join 348 other subscribers


Dear reader,

In September 2016, my website server crashed. I've been working on fixing everything since.

This site is currently in a beta state, meaning that design changes and the addition of new features will be frequent.