|  | 

History

King Louis XVI – Le Décapité One

King Louis XVI, one of the most known figureheads of French History, is also one of the most unlucky leaders of his time. At first, he was popular – with the region seeing him as a young, fit new leader with divine rights. However, as the end of the Old Regime approached and the young King’s world fell apart around him, he proved to be an unfit leader and faced that fact at the guillotine in 1793. Although King Louis was a popular symbol at first, with the people being fairly happy, his overall downfall was his impact on French society overtime.  While he and his wife’s own personalities didn’t help their case, with Marie Antoinette sneering “let them eat cake” when told the people had no bread, it was their popularity overtime that ended their reign.

In the year of 1789, the Estates-General was called to solve the financial crisis of France, due to foreign wars. King Louis XVI had hoped to be able to place a tax upon the second class in order to perhaps lighten the load on France’s economic foundation. However, the second class, the Nobles, did not want to lose their precious privileges. While the second class argued to keep their privileges against taxes, nobody could agree on how to vote for the issue, since the last meeting was about one hundred and seventy five years before. The third class wanted more representatives, even though it wouldn’t matter since each class had one vote to the matter, and the first and second class (the two smaller but more important parties) would have voted against it, leaving the popular vote unread. Thus, King Louis first showed that he wasn’t a good leader, and the Estates-General meeting of 1789 failed. This is when the third estate, the largest class of 97%, saw that perhaps their king wasn’t quite fit to be in charge.

Newspapers put down King Louis XVI soon afterwards, and eventually Louis had absolutely no power, giving in to the people’s every whim. They wanted something, he refused, they threatened to kill him, and he’d agree. When a group of women went to the market and saw no food or bread, they marched to Versailles and demanded the royal family move to Paris to fix it. Lots of violence ensued, and the King was told it was his responsibility to feed the people even though the people were puppeting him at this time. This, for one, changed the course of the revolution, showing everyone he really wasn’t a good leader, by compromising everything at this point and doing what women and children told him too. The people watched as their economy collapsed and financial Hell nipped at the country’s heels, and immediately blamed King Louis. As time moved on and things got worse, the country grew more and more angry with Louis and placed him in a terrible, “ugly” cassel. This is what started the final chain reaction that would lead to King Louis XVI’s eventual decapitation and death.

Radical revolutionaries and nobles began organizing resistance to the revolution, so a revolution against the revolution, due to their loss of power, and religion pursued against the country as catholics openly attacked protestants. This is when King Louis XVI grows anxious about the revolts, and sneaks out with his family to Varmes, a smaller city outside the capital of France, Paris. His main goal was to slip into Austria, a nation against France, and flee from the unstable, yet growing, revolution around him. Which is when he is seen and recognized from the national coin, and dragged back to Paris. Soon discovered that he was trying to leave France and  the growing issues around him, and even worse the fact the country he planned on fleeing to was a main enemy to the French people (and even worse, their Revolution), was enough for a speedy trial. Which is when his popularity in his own country went to an all time low, and the people decided they no longer needed him as their very own monarchist puppet.

King Louis XVI, once popular and loved in the Kingdom of France, faced a serious downfall caused by economic, financial and political affairs. Many events, including the Estates-General and March to Versailles, proved to the people of the revolution that he was an unfit leader, and caved in when oppressed. King Louis’s personality had nothing to do with the downfall (even though one could say Marie Antoinette’s attitude didn’t help the situation), and his eventual downfall was lead to the issues that broke his popularity and leadership in the eyes of his people. Thus, the French Revolutionaries could destroy the symbol of power and continue fighting for their causes – which would eventually lead to Maximilien Robespierre and the Reign of Terror.

Some Related Articles:

king-louis-xvi

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books. Unlike the stereotypical leftist, I do not necessarily censor myself. I apologize in advance if you find yourself offended by something I’ve said; but I do enjoy hearing criticism and having debates.

Related Articles

  • Book Review: The Economy of Colonial America by Edwin J. Perkins

    Book Review: The Economy of Colonial America by Edwin J. Perkins

    Edwin J. Perkins, a leading figure in American economic history and one of the main three authors that depict the economic situations of the colonial era, is an emeritus professor at the University of Southern California. He currently resides in Laguana Woods in California, where he pursues his own research despite being “retired”, and spends

  • Book Review: The Elizabethan Renaissance by A. L. Rowse

    Book Review: The Elizabethan Renaissance by A. L. Rowse

    Alfred Leslie Rowse, oftentimes shortened to A. L. Rowse, is best known for his work on England under Queen Elizabeth I’s reign as monarch. He was born on December 4th, 1903, in Cornwall. Mr. Rowse is the perfect example of a man of greatness born against all odds, as both his mother and father lived

  • Women’s Roles in New England vs Women’s Roles in The South

    Women’s Roles in New England vs Women’s Roles in The South

    How could you compare and contrast women’s roles in New England with women’s roles in The South? Colonial America had a rather deep division between the north and south. As we know from generalized American history, the northern and southern traditions in America would eventually clash together to cause a great Civil War. But, as for

  • Professionalizing History 6: The Public History of Our Community

    Professionalizing History 6: The Public History of Our Community

    In the last installment of Professionalizing History, we talked about the new age question of whether or not it’s important to apologize for mistakes we’ve made in the past. I highly recommend reading this series in order by publish date in order to fully understand what it means to professionalize history. This time around, I’d like to

POST YOUR COMMENTS

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Joseph Kaminski
I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books.

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive up-to-date notifications.

Join 348 other subscribers

AN IMPORTANT NOTICE

Dear reader,

In September 2016, my website server crashed. I've been working on fixing everything since.

This site is currently in a beta state, meaning that design changes and the addition of new features will be frequent.