|  |  | 

History Politics

1960 Presidential Debate: Kennedy vs. Nixon

kennedy_nixon

John F Kennedy (left) and Richard M Nixon (right).

The date is 8:30 in the evening on Monday, September 26th, 1960. The world, or at least America, watches as Republican Vice President Richard Milhous Nixon and Democratic Senator John Fitzgerald Kennedy (the two leading and strongest candidates for the position of the 35th President of the United States) participated in the first ever televised presidential debate. The city is Chicago, the Windy City.

And the channel is the WBBM-TV, owned by CBS. The growing influence of television seemed to show the entire world of entertainment and news broadcasting that sometimes, it’s not just what is said that matters. It’s how one looks and acts in the eyes of the public. While previous presidential “debates” (which really weren’t debates or even the presidential candidates really speaking at once) and conflicts were hosted by either the written words or voice-only radio broadcasts, the first ever television debate showed (albeit in black and white) the American people the true “colors” of the two candidates that were quarreling over who would sit in the chair that controlled the Land of Freedom.

And, although the people of America at this time did not know this at this time, which man would receive the destiny of being assassinated. But, that’s just a theory. Perhaps Lee Harvey Oswald, or whoever the conspiracy theorists out there wish to believe was truly behind JFK’s assassination, wouldn’t have had quite the same motive or setting had Nixon been elected. Perhaps Nixon, if voted into office, wouldn’t have ever been in the same state as Harvey Oswald. Or, maybe the insane man would have kept true to his fate and attempted assassination anyways. We will never know. But that’s the thing about alternate history; although interesting, it can never be proven.

The uncolored picture of television showed the Americans a falsified and perceived image of both presidential candidates. Kennedy, perhaps on of the sickest men to ever take office, appeared tan, healthy and charismatic. A man without illnesses, which was far from the case. Nixon, on the other hand, looked unkempt, unhealthy and tense while speaking. Pale in comparison to the man standing next to him. Kennedy appeared aggressive with his ideals and Democratic basis, standing relaxed and unmoved by Nixon’s rebuttles. Nixon, seemingly sweating and tensed by the presence of cameras and the questions presented by candidate Kennedy and the host of the debate.

shaking-hands

Kennedy and Nixon shaking hands.

Nixon would eventually run again for president in 1968, without a televised presidential broadcast. On Sept. 14, 1971, Nixon said, “Remember, even on the first debate. We made the mistake of not — for that one. Well, or — we got prepared. Worked like hell.” With the utter failure of his side of the debate in 1960, eight years before, behind him, Richard Nixon refused to allow the mistake to happen again. He refused to participate in a debate against democratic candidates Hubert Humphrey in 1968 and George McGovern in 1972. No presidential debate would occur again until Ford vs. Carter after Nixon’s resignation, 16 years after the very first.

Here it is, from the JFK Library, the very first presidential debate (the first of four between future 35th President John Fitzgerald Kennedy and future 37th President Richard Milhous Nixon). Film footage copyrighted by the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation.

Now, for comparison, if you’d like to see how these debates have changed, here is the first presidential debate from the most recent election, between Republican candidate and former Massachusetts governor Willard Mitt Romney and Democratic reelection candidate and former Illinois senator Barack Hussein Obama II.

The topics on the minds of the American people haven’t seemed to change much in the fifty two years since the first debate between Nixon and Kennedy, and the idea of the debate itself remains the same.

presidents

kennedy-vs-nixon

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books. Unlike the stereotypical leftist, I do not necessarily censor myself. I apologize in advance if you find yourself offended by something I’ve said; but I do enjoy hearing criticism and having debates.

Related Articles

  • Book Review: The Economy of Colonial America by Edwin J. Perkins

    Book Review: The Economy of Colonial America by Edwin J. Perkins

    Edwin J. Perkins, a leading figure in American economic history and one of the main three authors that depict the economic situations of the colonial era, is an emeritus professor at the University of Southern California. He currently resides in Laguana Woods in California, where he pursues his own research despite being “retired”, and spends

  • Book Review: The Elizabethan Renaissance by A. L. Rowse

    Book Review: The Elizabethan Renaissance by A. L. Rowse

    Alfred Leslie Rowse, oftentimes shortened to A. L. Rowse, is best known for his work on England under Queen Elizabeth I’s reign as monarch. He was born on December 4th, 1903, in Cornwall. Mr. Rowse is the perfect example of a man of greatness born against all odds, as both his mother and father lived

  • Women’s Roles in New England vs Women’s Roles in The South

    Women’s Roles in New England vs Women’s Roles in The South

    How could you compare and contrast women’s roles in New England with women’s roles in The South? Colonial America had a rather deep division between the north and south. As we know from generalized American history, the northern and southern traditions in America would eventually clash together to cause a great Civil War. But, as for

  • Professionalizing History 6: The Public History of Our Community

    Professionalizing History 6: The Public History of Our Community

    In the last installment of Professionalizing History, we talked about the new age question of whether or not it’s important to apologize for mistakes we’ve made in the past. I highly recommend reading this series in order by publish date in order to fully understand what it means to professionalize history. This time around, I’d like to

2 Comments

  1. Jimmy

    I think this was the first election where the channels of comminicatuon stood out more than the actual ads.Eighteen million people went to Obama’s channel on YouTube. Two million people donated their Facebook statuses to the Obama campaign. Thousands of people signed up for The Great Schlep. This is the point where the skill of harnessing technology to engage audiences became as important as the skill of crafting films to engage audiences.

POST YOUR COMMENTS

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Joseph Kaminski
I’m a writer and historian. Simple enough, right? I enjoy philosophy, sociology, social psychology, politics, basic programming, statistics, and old books.

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive up-to-date notifications.

Join 348 other subscribers

AN IMPORTANT NOTICE

Dear reader,

In September 2016, my website server crashed. I've been working on fixing everything since.

This site is currently in a beta state, meaning that design changes and the addition of new features will be frequent.